Research Report Peer Review Form

 

Name of Reviewer _________________________

Project Reviewed _________________________

Date _________________________

 

After reading a Research Report written by other students, answer the following questions.  Remember to keep your answers friendly and constructive.

 

 

1.      What was a particular strength in this experimental design?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.      Do you agree with the conclusions?  Do they appear to be supported by the results of the experiment?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.      What suggestions can you make for improving this experiment or report?

 


Poster Peer Review Form

 

Name of Reviewer_____________

Poster Reviewed_____________

Date_____________

 

Key:

1 – Largely unclear

2 – Somewhat clear

3 – Mostly clear

4 – Very clear

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                (-)         (+)

Does the poster include: Title, Research Question, Hypothesis, Procedure, Results, Conclusions, and Acknowledgments?

1  2  3  4

Is there a clear statement of the research question and hypothesis?

 

1  2  3  4

Does the experiment appear to be designed appropriately to address the research question?

1  2  3  4

Are the procedures described in enough detail for the experiment to be copied by someone else?

1  2  3  4

Are the data presented clearly?

1  2  3  4

Is there a clear explanation of the results?

1  2  3  4

Do the conclusions seem well supported by the data?

1  2  3  4

Were the presenters able to answer questions clearly?

1  2  3  4

Is the poster attractive and easy to read and understand?

1  2  3  4

 

TOTAL SCORE                                                                                               ________

 

Comments:

 

What was a particular strength of this experimental design?

 

 

 

 

 

What suggestions do you have for improving either this experiment or the poster presentation?