Design Challenge Peer Review Form

 

Evaluation Scale:

1 No evidence available for assessment

2 Does not meet minimum requirement

3 Minimum requirement questionable

4 Satisfies minimum requirement

5 Exceeds minimum requirement

 
Presenters: _______________________________

_______________________________

_______________________________

_______________________________

Assessed by: _______________________________

Date: _______________________________

 

Criteria

Evaluation

Weight

Points

The system is safe to handle and operate.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

The cost of the system is low.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

The system fits within 1 m2 area.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

The system is capable of performing several tests without repair.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

The design was based on appropriate principles of wastewater treatment.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

New contaminants did not appear to be added to the water during treatment.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

Treatment reduced the turbidity of the water.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

Nitrate and/or ammonia-N concentrations were reduced.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

Phosphate concentrations were reduced.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

Biological oxygen demand was reduced.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

Reasonable explanations were provided of the treatment system and its results.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

The presenters provided clear answers to any questions that were raised.

1 2 3 4 5

1 3 5

 

 

 

Total Points:

 

 

In each row, multiply the Evaluation score by the Weight (assigned by the teacher) to get the Point score. Then sum the numbers in column 4 to get the Total Points.

 

Comments:

What was a particular strength of this wastewater treatment design?

 

 

 

What suggestions do you have for improving either this design or the way in which it was presented?