Poster Peer Review Form

 

Name of Reviewer ______________________________ Date ______________

 

Project Reviewed __________________________________________________

 

 

                  Key:

1 – Largely unclear

2 – Somewhat clear

3 – Mostly clear

4 – Very clear                     

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                (-)         (+)

Does the poster include: Title, Research Question, Hypothesis, Procedure, Results, Conclusions, and Acknowledgments?

1  2  3  4

Is there a clear statement of the research question and hypothesis?

 

1  2  3  4

Does the experiment appear to be designed appropriately to address the research question?

1  2  3  4

Are the procedures described in enough detail for the experiment to be copied by someone else?

1  2  3  4

Are the data presented clearly?

1  2  3  4

Is there a clear explanation of the results?

1  2  3  4

Do the conclusions seem well supported by the data?

1  2  3  4

Were the presenters able to answer questions clearly?

1  2  3  4

Is the poster attractive and easy to read and understand?

1  2  3  4

 

TOTAL SCORE                                                                                               ________

 

Comments:

 

What was a particular strength of this research design?

 

 

 

 

 

What suggestions do you have for improving either this research or the poster presentation?

 

 

 

 

© NSTA. Cornell Scientific Inquiry Series.

For use with Invasion Ecology, Section 3: Beyond Protocols