Poster Peer Review Form

 

Name of Reviewer_____________

Poster Reviewed_____________

Date_____________

 

Key:

1 Largely unclear

2 Somewhat clear

3 Mostly clear

4 Very clear

 

 

(-) (+)

Does the poster include: Title, Research Question, Hypothesis, Procedure, Results, Conclusions, and Acknowledgments?

1 2 3 4

Is there a clear statement of the research question and hypothesis?

 

1 2 3 4

Does the experiment appear to be designed appropriately to address the research question?

1 2 3 4

Are the procedures described in enough detail for the experiment to be copied by someone else?

1 2 3 4

Are the data presented clearly?

1 2 3 4

Is there a clear explanation of the results?

1 2 3 4

Do the conclusions seem well supported by the data?

1 2 3 4

Were the presenters able to answer questions clearly?

1 2 3 4

Is the poster attractive and easy to read and understand?

1 2 3 4

 

TOTAL SCORE ________

 

Comments:

 

What was a particular strength of this experimental design?

 

 

 

 

 

What suggestions do you have for improving either this experiment or the poster presentation?

 

 

 

 

 

 

NSTA. Cornell Scientific Inquiry Series.

For use with Assessing Toxic Risk, Section 3: Conducting Interactive Research